CRISPR patent wars highlight problem of granting broad intellectual property rights for tech that offers public benefits

Phys.org – Duke University Law professor Arti Rai and bio-technology professor Robert Cook-Deegan with Arizona State University have stepped into the gene editing patent war with an Intellectual Property Policy Forum paper they have had published in the journal Science. They suggest that courts should take more into account than who invented what first in some property rights disputes. With technology, such as CRISPR-Cas9, for example, they argue that some thought (and rights) should to be given to the public as beneficiaries of future research efforts related to that technology.

Read more at Phys.org.

News Image
US patent cover
Action
Science
Image Citation

USPTO